loolooland
loolooland loolooland
  • 01-02-2021
  • English
contestada

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source, because the information it publishes is not:

Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because the information it publishes is not class=

Respuesta :

jrmcbride05
jrmcbride05 jrmcbride05
  • 01-02-2021

Answer:

Written by profesionals

Explanation:

Wikipedia alows anyone to post information as facts. Some people know what they are talking about and are correct but the site has been proven to give faulse information because the content isn't written by experts on the subject. Hope this helps :)

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which best describes Islam? a. It was founded in Rome b. It does not involve prayer c. It uses the Torah d. It was monotheistic
how do you convert gallons to liters? Explain
what does the off center rectangle mean in the picture?
Take a look at the statement below: Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers. How could this statement be revised to make it a hypothesis? Fish meal is s
does anyone know what has integers as it's square root?
Which two cellular structures have a role in the creation of proteins? A. nucleus and ribosomes B. ribosomes and mitochondria C. nucleus and mitochondria D. mit
if 3 times a number is equal to 3/2, what is the number?
with the vital assistance of ,theodore roosevelt established the first comprehensive national conservation policy.
Which of these is true for both photosynthesis and cellular respiration? a.Both occur in all organisms b.Both occur in most producers c.Both produce carbon diox
rewrite this expression using the distributive property then simplify. 2/3(6x+12)